Prediction of Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Shahar Peer Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
A. Friedsam vs S. Peer

Anna-Lena Friedsam

GER

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.74m

Height

1.70m

193

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$1.1M

Career Money

$2.9M

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Shahar Peer

ISR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.74m

Height

1.70m

193

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$1.1M

Career Money

$2.9M

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Head-to-head: Friedsam 1 - 0 Peer

They have played 3 sets in total, with Anna-Lena Friedsam winning 2 and Shahar Peer winning 1. The last match between Anna-Lena Friedsam and Shahar Peer was at the The OEC Taipei WTA Ladies Open - Taipei, 06-11-2014, Round: R2, Surface: Carpet, with Anna-Lena Friedsam getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Friedsam	1
Peer	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) The OEC Taipei WTA Ladies Open - Taipei(11-06-14)

Stats

Anna-Lena Friedsam

Shahar Peer

A. Friedsam vs S. Peer H2H Profile

A. Friedsam	Stats	S. Peer
$1,078,782	Career Prize Money	$2,894,734
60.00% (399-266)	Career Total W/L	58.08% (388-280)
1	Indoor	0
15	Titles	9
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0.00% (0-2)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

A. Friedsam vs S. Peer Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Anna-Lena Friedsam has won 43.45% of points on their second serve, while Shahar Peer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Anna-Lena Friedsam, in recent form, has won 50.29% of their opponent's second serve points, while Shahar Peer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.52% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Anna-Lena Friedsam has saved 54.48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Shahar Peer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Anna-Lena Friedsam has won 64.41% of matches played (W/L 38/21), with Shahar Peer winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Anna-Lena Friedsam has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 123/60), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 16/19). Shahar Peer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 247/165), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 18/23).
Player level: In the last year, Anna-Lena Friedsam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.89% of matches (W/L 31/14), where as Shahar Peer has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Anna-Lena Friedsam winning 1 times and Shahar Peer being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Anna-Lena Friedsam winning 2 and Shahar Peer winning 1.
The last match between Anna-Lena Friedsam and Shahar Peer was at the The OEC Taipei WTA Ladies Open - Taipei, 06-11-2014, Round: R2, Surface: Carpet, with Anna-Lena Friedsam getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:49:20.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Anna-Lena Friedsam has played against opponents with an average rank of 254.02 while Shahar Peer has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Anna-Lena Friedsam has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Shahar Peer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Anna-Lena Friedsam has converted 39.34% of breakpoint opportunities, and Shahar Peer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Shahar Peer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

A. Friedsam vs S. Peer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

A. Friedsam	Stats	S. Peer
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
15	Games Won	11
8	Aces (Total)	0
3	Total Double Faults	5
1:49:20	Average Match Time	1:49:20
70% (62/88)	1st Serve %	69% (56/81)
65% (40/62)	1st Serve Win %	55% (31/56)
50% (13/26)	2nd Serve Win %	56% (14/25)
38% (5/13)	Break Pts Won %	27% (3/11)
44% (36/81)	Return Points Win %	40% (35/88)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

A. Friedsam Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Open In Arte Angers Loire - Angers - 01-12-2025
R1 Teodora KostovicT. Kostovic	W	6-3 7-6(7)	Stats
Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F - 10-11-2025
Rubber 1 Jeline VandrommeJ. Vandromme	L	7-6(0) 2-6 6-3	Stats
Austin 125 - Austin - 03-11-2025
R1 Iva JovicI. Jovic	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
Torneo Internazionale - Rovereto - 20-10-2025
QF Oksana SelekhmetevaO. Selekhmeteva	L	3-6 6-2 6-3	Stats
R2 Linda KlimovicovaL. Klimovicova	W	4-6 6-1 6-2	Stats

View All

S. Peer Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Abierto Monterrey Afirme - Monterrey - 29-02-2016
Q1 Viktorija GolubicV. Golubic	L	6-4 7-5	Stats
Rio Open - Rio de Janeiro - 15-02-2016
Q1 Paula Cristina GoncalvesP. Cristina	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Fed Cup, Europe/Africa Zone Group I - 01-02-2016
Rubber 1 Kateryna VolodkoK. Volodko	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Rubber 1 Tena LukasT. Lukas	W	3-6 6-1 6-2	Stats
Rubber 1 Valeria GorlatsV. Gorlats	W	6-0 6-3	Stats

View All

A. Friedsam vs S. Peer Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

A. Friedsam	Stats	S. Peer
60.00% (399/266)	YTD Win/Loss	58.35% (388/277)
58.04% (899/650)	Sets Win/Loss	56.14% (855/668)
53.49% (7697/6692)	Games Win/Loss	52.37% (7235/6580)
55.67% (108/86)	Hard Win/Loss	59.95% (247/165)
59.66% (139/94)	Clay Win/Loss	57.53% (84/62)
67.00% (136/67)	Indoor Hard W/L	59.09% (39/27)
45.71% (16/19)	Grass Win/Loss	43.90% (18/23)
0.23	Aces Per Game	0.08
1586	Aces Total	551
0.24	Double Faults Per Game	0.23
1710	Total Double Faults	1575
1:11:49	Average Match Time	1st Match
467.41	Average Opponent Rank	515.15
65% (22502/34674)	1st Serve %	65% (21212/32646)
65% (14678/22502)	1st Serve Win %	61% (12882/21212)
46% (5595/12170)	2nd Serve Win %	44% (5081/11441)
45% (1714/3774)	Break Points Won % (Total)	48% (2024/4236)
43% (14623/34256)	Return Points Win %	46% (15135/32818)
36.84% (21/36)	Slam W/L	57.14% (60/45)
33.33% (10/20)	Masters W/L	54.84% (85/70)
33.33% (2/4)	Cups W/L	61.76% (21/13)
52.88% (101/90)	Main Tour W/L	59.43% (189/129)
67.95% (212/100)	Challenger W/L	62.26% (33/20)
76.81% (53/16)	Futures W/L	0% (0/0)
60% (390/651)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	58% (384/659)
100% (1/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (2/2)
52% (92/177)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	57% (71/125)
54% (123/229)	Deciding Set Win %	58% (114/195)
85% (392/335)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (370/321)
14% (392/56)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (370/49)
23% (273/63)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	23% (295/67)